ПІДХІД, ОРІЄНТОВАНИЙ НА СИЛЬНІ СТОРОНИ, У РОБОТІ З ТЕРИТОРІАЛЬНИМИ ГРОМАДАМИ: ОГЛЯД МІЖНАРОДНОЇ ПРАКТИКИ
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31499/2618-0715.1(8).2022.262681Ключові слова:
соціальна робота в територіальній громаді, територіальна громада, ресурси, колективне наснаження, колективна дія, участь громад, резилієнс громади, соціальний капітал, емансипативна практикаАнотація
У статті на основі аналізу закордонної літератури визначено особливості застосування на
рівні територіальної громади підходу, орієнтованого на її сильні сторони. Установлено, що
цей підхід належить до емансипативної макропрактики соціальної роботи і спрямований
на використання ресурсів громади для розв’язання колективних проблем та забезпечення
справедливих відносин у громаді. Визначено, що у відносно сталих ситуаціях
використовують такі стратегії, як: участь громади, колективне наснаження; розвиток
громад на основі ресурсів. Під час кризових та надзвичайних ситуацій застосовують
стратегію розвитку резилієнсу громади.
Посилання
Naidonova, L. A., Otsaliuk, A. M. (2007). Samoorhanizatsiini komponenty rozvytku terytorialnykh
hromad mista [Self-organizational components of development of territorial communities of the
city]. Naukovi studii iz sotsialnoi ta politychnoi psykholohii, 15 (18): 89–101 [in Ukrainian].
Ostrom, E. (2012). Keruvannia spilnym. Evoliutsiia instytutsii kolektyvnoi dii [Governing the
Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action]. Kyiv: Nash chas [in Ukrainian].
Palatna, D. O. (2021). Instrumenty makropraktyky sotsialno roboty dlia rozvytku sotsialnykh
posluh v hromadakh [Tools of social work macropractice for the development of social services in
communities]. Dytyna u tryvozhnomu seredovyshchi: rozvyvalni i vidnovliuvalni praktyky : zb. tez III
Vseukrainskogo forumu za mizhnar. uchastju (pp. 66–70). Kyiv: KNUTSh [in Ukrainian].
Payne, M. (1997). Soobshchestvo kak osnova sotsyalnoi polytyky y sotsyalnogo deistvyia
[Community as the basis of social policy and social action.]. Vzaymosviaz sotsyalnoi raboti i sotsyalnoi
politiki (pp. 44–62). Moscow : Aspect Press [in Russian].
Petrushenko, Y. M. (2014). Sotsialno-ekonomichna sutnist ta finansova samodostatnist
terytorialnykh hromad [Socio-economic essence and financial self-sufficiency of territorial
communities]. Naukovyy visnyk Chernivets’koho universytetu, 710–711: 45–48 [in Ukrainian].
Semigina, T., Lykhovyd, D. (2015). Kolektyvne nasnazhennia i samoorhanizatsiia terytorialnoi
hromady [Collective empowerment and self-organization of the territorial community]. Naukovi
zapysky NaUKMA. Pedahohichni, psykholohichni nauky i sotsialna robota, 175: 70–74 [in Ukrainian].
Semigina, T. (2018). Chomu sotsialna robota nabuvaie zelenoho koloru? [Why does social work
turn green?. Visnyk Akademii pratsi, sotsialnykh vidnosyn i turyzmu, 2: 11–27 [in Ukrainian].
Semigina, T. V. (2019). Rozvytok u suchasnii sotsialnii roboti pidkhodiv, oriientovanykh na sylni
storony kliientiv [Development in modern social work of approaches focused on the strengths of
clients]. Paradigms of the Modern Educational Process: Opportunities and Challenges for Society (pp.
–105). 1st ed. Dallas : Primedia eLaunch LLS [in Ukrainian].
Syla, T., Forrester, S. (2018). Mobilizatsiia hromad: dosvid PROON u realizatsii pidkhodu
hromadskoi bezpeky i sotsialnoi zghurtovanosti [Community Mobilization : UNDP Experience in
Implementing the Public Safety and Social Cohesion Approach].
https://www.ua.undp.org/content/ukraine/uk/home/library/recovery-andpeacebuilding/community-mobilization-guidebook.html (access 20.02.2022) [in Ukrainian].
Slozanska, H. I. (2018). Sotsialna robota v terytorialnii hromadi: teorii, modeli ta metody [Social
work in the territorial community: theories, models and methods]. Ternopil : TNPU imeni V.
Hnatiuka [in Ukrainian].
Sorokyn, P. A. (1992). Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo [Man. Civilization. Society]. Moscow :
Polytyzdat. [in Russian].
Stoliaryk, O., Semigina, T. (2020). Pidkhid, oriientovanyi na sylni storony kliientiv, u sotsialnii
roboti z sim’iamy, yaki vykhovuiut ditei z autyzmom [A strenght-based approach to social work with
families raising children with autism]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats ΛΌHOΣ, 10–13 [in Ukrainian].
Shvalb, Y. M. (2014). Psykholohycheskye osnovanyia sotsyoheneza: obshchyna, naselenye i
soobshchestvo kak sub’ekti sotsyalnykh otnoshenyi. Aktualni problemy psykholohii, 7(35): 317–329
[in Russian].
Yatsenko, M. A. (2004). Samovriaduvalnyi mekhanizm zdiisnennia rehionalnoi sotsialnoi polityky za
umov transformatsii ukrainskoho suspilstva [Self-governing mechanism for implementing regional
social policy in the context of the transformation of Ukrainian society]: Candidate’s thesis. Kharkiv [in
Ukrainian].
Alston, M., Hazeleger, T., Hargreaves, D. (2019). Social work and disasters: A handbook for practice.
Abingdon: Routledge.
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of
planners, 35 (4): 216–224.
Bellinger, A., Ford, D. (2022). The Strengths Approach in Practice : How It Changes Live. Bristol :
Bristol University Press.
Todd, S., & Drolet, J. L., eds. (2020). Community Practice and Social Development in Social Work.
Singapore : Springer Nature.
Delanty, G. (2003). Community. London and New York: Routledge.
Drolet, J., Dominelli, L., Alston, M., Ersing, R., Mathbor, G., & Wu, H. (2015). Women rebuilding lives
post-disaster: Innovative community practices for building resilience and promoting sustainable
development. Gender & Development, 23 (3): 433–448.
Eriksson, L. (2011). Community development and social pedagogy: traditions for understanding
mobilization for collective self-development. Community Development Journal, 46 (4): 403–420.
Gilchrist, A. (2019). The well-connected community: a networking approach to community
development. 3d ed. Bristol : Policy Press.
International Federation of Social Work. (2014). Global definition of social work.
https://www.ifsw.org/what-is-social-work/global-definition-of-social-work/ (access: 20.02.2022).
Goel, K., Pulla, V., & Francis, A. P. (Eds.). (2014). Community Work : theories, experiences and
challenges. Bangalore : Niruta Publications.
Gray, M., & Collett van Rooyen, C. (2002). The strengths perspective in social work: Lessons from
practice. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 38 (3): 193–201.
Ife, J. (2013). Community development in an uncertain world. 2d ed. Cambridge : Cambridge
University Press.
Maglajlic, R. A. (2019). Organisation and delivery of social services in extreme events: Lessons
from social work research on natural disasters. International Social Work, 62 (3): 1146–1158.
Manor, J. (2004). Democratisation with inclusion: Political reforms and people’s empowerment at
the grassroots. Journal of Human Development, 5(1): 5–29.
Midgley, J., Conley, A. (2010). Social work and social development: theories and skills for
developmental social work. New York: Oxford University Press.
Morris, R. (1979). The role of the agent in local community work. Strategies of Community
Organization (pp. 203–213). 3d ed. Itasca, IL: Peacock Publishers.
Strategic Scrunity Group (2019). Principles for community empowerment. Retrieved from:
https://www.auditscotland.gov.uk/uploads/docs/report/2019/briefing_190725_community_empowerment.pdf
(access 20.02.22)
Pulla, V. (2017). Strengths-based approach in social work: A distinct ethical advantage.
International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 3(2): 97–114.
Rambaree, K., Powers, M. C., & Smith, R. J. (2019). Ecosocial work and social change in community
practice. Journal of Community Practice, 27(3–4): 205–212.
Rapp, C. A., & Goscha, R. J. (2011). The strengths model: A recovery-oriented approach to mental
health services. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dominelli, L., ed. (2007). Revitalising communities in a globalising world. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Rubin, H. J. & Rubin, I. (2008). Community organizing and development. 4th ed. USA : Pearson.
Sadan, E. (1997). Empowerment and Community Planning: Theory and practice. Tel Aviv :
Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishers.
Saleebey, D. (2013). Strengths perspective in social work practice. 6th ed. USA : Pearson.
Seller, E. P. (2015). Social work and local community development in the 21st century. Arbor:
Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura, 191(771),
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279285907_Social_Work_and_local_community_develop
ment_in_the_21st_century (access: 20.02,2022).
Semigina, T., Maidannyk, O., Onischyk, Y., & Zhuravel, Y. (2020). Local self-government reforms in
Europe: legal aspects of considering the communities’ social identity. Juridical Tribune / Tribuna
Juridica, 10 (2): 207–221.
Rothman, J., Erlich, J. & Tropman, J., eds. (2008). Strategies of community intervention. 7th ed.
Peosta : Eddie bowers publishing company.
Torczyner, J. (2021). Rights-based Community Practice and Academic Activism in a Turbulent
World: Putting Theory Into Practice in Israel, Palestine and Jordan. Milton : Routledge.
Weick, A., Rapp, C., Sullivan, W. P., & Kisthardt, W. (1989). A strengths perspective for social work
practice. Social work, 34 (6): 350–354.
Zajda, K. (2014). Problems of functioning of Polish local action groups from the perspective of the
social capital concept. Eastern European Countryside, 20 (1): 73–97.
